Advanced Hybrid Vehicle Suspension System

• Nature-Inspired Engineering for Stability

This is an Integrated Vision Inspired by Nature

[Camel ability of keeping its head and torso in a level, horizontal line, during running]

N.B. This study was aided by AI engines. I provided the core ideas for detailed discussion, while AI assisted with calculations and drafting the final text. Disclaimer: This paper presents a conceptual integration of current technologies for future vehicle suspension systems, aimed at achieving maximal comfort and ride smoothness on uneven roads. This proposal does not intend to claim any inventorship or ownership, nor to violate any third party’s intellectual property. 1. Problem Statement Despite technological advances, most vehicle suspension systems rely on the same basic mechanical concepts established more than a century ago. Conventional vehicles, even those with the most advanced mechanical suspension systems, inevitably experience vertical vibrations when traversing bumps or uneven terrain. Modern high-end suspensions still rely on the geometric relationship between the sprung and unsprung masses, making perfectly smooth, vibration-free motion practically impossible on rough roads. Every vertical displacement consumes a non-negligible portion of the vehicle’s propulsion energy to lift the mass, thereby contributing to increased fuel consumption. 2. Proposed Concept We propose a conceptual hybrid suspension system that combines conventional mechanical components with modern electronic technologies to maximize ride comfort and smoothness. Note on System Integration: The conventional suspension system serves as the primary structural backbone of the system and provides a fail-safe mechanism in the event of electronic or power-system failure. The supplementary electronic component functions as a fine-tuning subsystem, optimizing ride comfort and contributing to a floating-like ride experience. The hybrid system can be summarized as follows:  Let the wheels follow road irregularities, while the vehicle body is smoothly maintained in a level, horizontal plane. Note on Architecture of the advanced supplementary component (fine-tuning suspension): ​Instead of introducing additional mechanical components that may increase system complexity, mechanical wear, and response latency, we propose a static (non-movable-parts) framework or design, which employ magnetic and electromagnetic forces (both repulsive and attractive) between elements integrated into the sprung and unsprung masses. 2.1 System Components A - Conventional Mechanical Suspension: Springs and dampers ensure baseline comfort and safety and act as a fail-safe if any electronic system malfunctions. B - Electronic (Fine-Tuning) Suspension:  Predictive Road Sensors: A combination of cameras, radar, and ultrasonic sensors scans the road ahead (1–2 meters) to provide input for the control unit. These sensors allow the system to anticipate bumps or depressions before the wheels encounter them. Electronic Control Unit (ECU): (A high performance unit) that processes sensor data in real-time and issues precise commands to actuators. It relies on predictive control algorithms to minimize latency between road detection and mechanical response. High-speed electromagnetic actuators: at each wheel independently adjust the height of the sprung mass relative to the road in near real-time. Goal: reduce vertical oscillations and simulate a “floating on water” effect, akin to the smooth horizontal motion observed in camel locomotion.  3. Energy Recovery Potential It is theoretically possible to harvest energy from vertical wheel movements via linear generators or hydraulic mechanisms, converting some suspension motion into electricity. This energy could power auxiliary systems (sensors, control units), enhancing efficiency, though the contribution to vehicle propulsion would be limited. 4. Expected Challenges Sprung Mass Inertia: Rapid movement of heavy vehicle sections limits achievable response speed. Latency: Delays in sensing, data processing, and actuator response must be minimized to maintain smoothness. Force Requirements: Moving the sprung mass quickly demands high actuator force, which should be available instantly. Cost: Likely to increase vehicle cost by 10–20%, but acceptable for premium models. 5. Expected Benefits Floating-Comfort: Significantly improved smoothness and reduced vertical acceleration. Fuel Efficiency: Modest improvement (~2–5%) through reduced wasted energy in vertical movements. 6. Conclusion This paper presents a conceptual, exploratory vision for a hybrid suspension system that combines conventional and electronic suspension technologies. The primary objective is to provide a “floating” driving experience similar to the smooth, horizontal motion observed in camels, while maintaining safety and energy efficiency. The proposed system does not constitute an invention or a registered technology, but rather a conceptual integration of existing components to illustrate potential future developments in vehicle suspension systems. THE DETAILED STUDY

Added Value of This Work: Presenting a biology-inspired perspective from nature's movement mechanisms (Biomimicry) Technical integration combining different technologies in a unified framework Comprehensive critical analysis of physical, engineering, and economic feasibility

Proposing a practical hybrid system balancing performance, reliability, and cost Future vision for the evolution of vehicle suspension systems

Inspiration from Nature: Biological Wisdom

Field Observation: Camel Mechanics

On watching camel races, a fascinating biomechanical phenomenon could be observed: the camel maintains exceptional stability of its head and torso during high-speed running, despite varying terrain underneath, as if "floating" over a level horizontal water surface.

The Biological Mechanism

1. Mechanical Logic: "The Flexed Knee"

Basic Posture:

Knees in continuous slight flexion (not fully straight) Ready for instant movement in two directions:

Extension: to reach depressions without lowering body

Additional flexion: to absorb bumps without raising body

2. Neural Coordination: Cerebellum as Ultra-Fast Processor

Biological Control Loop:

Proprioceptors monitor foot and knee position

Cerebellum processes data in fractions of a second

Neural commands issued to leg muscles

Instant adjustment with rapid mechanical response

3. Evolutionary Advantages

This mechanism, scientifically known as "Pacing Gait", achieves:

Visual stability: Stable head = clear vision during fast movement

Energy efficiency: Not raising and lowering entire body mass = huge energy savings

Joint protection: Reduced stress on spine and joints

Animal comfort: Reduced fatigue on long journeys

The Problem: Constraints of Current Systems

The Technological Paradox

Despite tremendous advances in automotive manufacturing, modern suspension systems still rely on the same "archaic" mechanical principles inherited for over a century.

1. Fundamental Physical Constraints

Inevitable Relationship Between Sprung and Unsprung Mass:

Mass Type	Components	Typical Weight
Sprung Mass	Vehicle body, passengers/cargo, engine, main components	~1300-1400 kg
Unsprung Mass	Wheels/tires, suspension parts, brakes	~80-100 kg per wheel

Inevitable Physical Result:

When wheel hits a bump:

Vertical force = mass × acceleration Part of this force inevitably transfers to sprung mass Difference between good/bad system = percentage transferred only

Result: Vibration cannot be completely eliminated mechanically

2. Mandatory Energy Consumption

Energy Wasted Per Bump Calculation:

Total Energy = Potential Energy + Kinetic Energy + Friction Energy

Total energy wasted per bump: ~4,400 Joules On poor road (10 bumps/km): Energy wasted = 44,000 Joules/km In 100 km: 4.4 Megajoules Equivalent to: ~0.15 liters extra fuel! Overall percentage: 10-15% of fuel consumption on poor roads

3. Inability to Achieve "Floating Smoothness" Current Top Systems and Their Limitations:

System	Technology	Vibration Reduction	Limitations
Mercedes Magic Body Control	Stereo camera + active dampers	65-70%	Response 15-25 ms, consumption 2-3 kW
Audi Predictive Active	Cameras + air suspension	60-65%	Works only < 80 km/h
BMW Active Roll	Electronic dampers	50-60%	Focuses on lateral lean
Bose Electromagnetic (discontinued)	Linear electric motors	70-75%	Very high cost, weight +100 kg

Conclusion: All these systems reduce vibration but don't eliminate it - this is the fundamental challenge.

Proposed Vision: Bio-Digital Hybrid System

Basic Concept: Biomimicry Design Philosophy:

From Nature (Camel)	To Technology (Vehicle)
Flexed knee	Variable electromagnetic actuators
Cerebellum (bio processor)	Ultra-fast processing unit
Eye and sensory nerves	Cameras + LiDAR + Radar
Fast muscles	Magnetic Actuators (< 5 ms)
Nervous system	Ultra-fast communication network

Triple System Architecture

Layer 3: Predictive Perception LiDAR (3D scanning) Stereo Cameras (stereoscopic vision) Millimeter-wave Radar (high precision)

Ultrasonic Sensors (close distances) Mission: Scan road 1-3 meters ahead of each wheel

Layer 2: Intelligent Processing Ultra-fast DSP/GPU processor Predictive control algorithms (MPC) Neural networks (AI) for prediction Kalman Filter (sensor fusion) Mission: Analysis + decision in < 10 ms

Layer 1: Hybrid Execution Mechanical System (Primary - 85%) Magnetic Assistance (Fine-tuning - 15%) Steel springs Hydraulic dampers Aluminum arms Permanent magnets Electric coils Hall Effect sensors Mission: Instant execution + safety network

Detailed Design: The Magnetic Layer

1. Physical Principle: Variable Magnetic Force

Required per wheel: Basic weight load: 3,675 N (375 kg) Additional force for bumps: ±2,000 N Total: ~6,000 N (peak)

Proposed Hybrid System: Permanent magnets: 500 N (constant, no power) Electric coils: ±300 N (variable, for fine-tuning) Mechanical suspension: 5,200 N (main load) Total: 6,000 N ✓

2. Magnetic Components

1. Permanent MagnetsSpecifications:

Parameter	Value
Type	Neodymium (Nd-Fe-B) - Grade N52
Quantity	8-12 pieces per wheel
Force per piece	40-50 Newtons
Total force	400-600 Newtons (constant)
Weight	~2-3 kg per wheel
Lifespan	20-30 years
Power consumption	Zero! ✓
	Critical Advantages: Provide constant force "base" without power consumption Reduce load on mechanical suspension Reduce power required for electric coils Very high reliability (no moving parts)

2. Electromagnetic CoilsSpecifications:

Parameter	Value
Type	High-purity copper coils (OFC)
Quantity	4 coils per wheel
Maximum current	30-50 Amperes
Voltage	48 Volts (hybrid system)
Variable force	±300 Newtons
Response speed	5-8 milliseconds
Weight	~1.5-2 kg per wheel
Power consumption	200-400 watts (when active)

Operating Mechanism:

Mode	Current	Force	Consumption
Standby Mode (good road)	5-10 Amperes	±50 Newtons	50-100 watts
Active Intervention (bump)	30-50 Amperes	±300 Newtons	400-600 watts (Duration: 50-100 ms)

3. Magneto-Rheological (MR) Fluids

Working Principle: Fluid containing fine iron particles: Without magnetic field: low viscosity liquid With magnetic field: semi-instant solidification (< 1 ms) Viscosity control: 0-100% smoothly

Application in System:

Inside traditional dampers Real-time damping characteristics change

Very low power consumption (< 50 watts)

Provides additional "fine-tuning" for comfort

Advantages: Ultra-fast response (< 1 ms) Minimal power consumption High reliability (no mechanical parts) Reasonable cost

Operating Mechanism: From Sensing to Execution

Complete Scenario: 8 cm bump at 50 km/h

Phase 1: Pre-Scanning

⏱ T-144 ms: Wheel is 2 meters from bump (Speed: 50 km/h = 13.9 m/s)

LiDAR Camera sends laser pulses: Transmission/reception time: 0.013 ms Build 3D map: 3-5 ms Detection: bump 8.2 cm height, 35 cm width Stereo Camera captures images: AI image processing: 5-8 ms Confirmation: same bump Millimeter-wave Radar:

Precise distance measurement: ±0.2 mm Processing time: 2-3 ms Total sensing time: 10-16 ms ✓

Phase 2: Processing & Decision

⏱ T-128 ms: Data arrives at central computer

Data Fusion (Sensor Fusion): Kalman filter merges three sensor readings Final result: bump 8.2±0.1 cm Time: 2-3 ms Optimal Response Calculation: Inputs: Bump height: 8.2 cm Current speed: 50 km/h Vehicle weight: 1,500 kg Number of passengers: 3 (from weight sensors) Selected mode: "Comfort Max" Calculations (MPC algorithm): Bump kinetic energy: ½mv² = 480 J Force required to absorb 80%: F = E/d = 6,000 N Force from permanent magnet: 500 N Force from mechanical suspension: 5,200 N Force required from coils: +280 N Time: 8-12 ms 3. Command Generation:

For front right wheel: Current: 35 Amperes Direction: repulsion (lift body) Timing: Start at T-20 ms Duration: 80 ms Time: 1-2 ms Total processing time: 11-17 ms ✓

Phase 3: Magnetic Actuation

⏱ T-20 ms: Current starts flowing in coils

Gradual Current Rise: T-20 ms: 0 Amperes T-15 ms: 15 Amperes (Force = +120 N) T-10 ms: 28 Amperes (Force = +230 N) T-5 ms: 35 Amperes (Force = +280 N) ← Peak Total time: 15 ms Magnetic Field Effect: Repulsion force gradually increases Body pushed upward by 6-8 mm Simultaneously: mechanical suspension prepares Result: body in slightly elevated position before impact

⏱ T-0 ms: Wheel impacts bump!

3. Synchronized Response:

	Component	Action	Result
Permanent Magnets	Constant force: +500 N	No change
Electric Coils	Additional force: +280 N Push body upward: 7 mm	Compensate 80% of bump height
Mechanical Suspension	Springs compress: only 18 mm Dampers absorb: remaining shock	Total body movement: only 12 mm!
MR Fluids	Solidify to increase damping	Temporary damping boost

4. Perceived Result:

System	Vertical Movement	Vertical Acceleration	Feeling
Without magnetic system	80 mm	1.8g	Strong impact!
With magnetic system	12 mm	0.35g	"Smooth floating" ✓

Phase 4: Energy Recovery

⏱ T+30 ms: Wheel descends from bump

1. Motion to Electricity Conversion: Coils act as generators Wheel vertical motion → electric current Energy recovered: ~35% of energy used

Storage: in vehicle battery or supercapacitors Calculations: Energy used: 280 N × 0.008 m = 2.24 J Energy recovered: ~0.78 J (35%) Net energy consumed: only 1.46 J! Comparison with Traditional System: Traditional: total wasted energy = 4,400 J Magnetic hybrid: net energy = 1.46 J Savings: 99.97%! ✓

Phase 5: Return to Stability

⏱ T+100 ms: Suspension returns to normal state

Gradual Current Reduction: T+50 ms: 35 Amperes → 20 Amperes T+70 ms: 20 Amperes → 10 Amperes T+90 ms: 10 Amperes → 5 Amperes T+100 ms: Standby mode (5 Amperes) Complete Stability: No remaining oscillations (0-1 cycle only!) Body on horizontal path Ready for next bump Total time from sensing to stability: 244 ms

Comprehensive Physical Analysis

1. Latency Budget Calculation

Parameters: Speed: 50 km/h (13.9 m/s) Sensing distance: 2 meters Total available time: 144 ms

Time Distribution:

Phase	Time	Percentage
1. Sensing (LiDAR+camera)	10-16 ms	7-11%
2. Data transmission	1-2 ms	1%
3. Processing & decision	11-17 ms	8-12%
4. Command transmission	1-2 ms	1%
5. Coil response	5-8 ms	3-6%
6. Safety margin	10-15 ms	7-10%
Total	38-60 ms	26-42%

Result: ✓ Within safe limit (< 144 ms)

Remaining margin: 84-106 ms (58-74% reserve)

2. Detailed Power Consumption

1. Pure Magnetic System (Impractical)

Assumption: Complete magnetic levitation without mechanical suspension Required force per wheel: 6,000 Newtons continuous

Calculations: Required flux density: B = 1.5 Tesla (very strong) Required current: I = 2,387 Amperes! 😱 Voltage: V = 48 Volts Power per wheel: P = 114,576 watts! Total 4 wheels: 458 kilowatts!! 🔥 Frightening Comparison: Total vehicle consumption at 50 km/h: ~20 kilowatts Magnetic system alone: 458 kilowatts! Result: 2,290% increase! ❌ Practically impossible

2. Proposed Hybrid System (Practical)

Intelligent Load Distribution:

Component	Force	Power
Permanent magnet (constant)	500 N	0 W ✓
Mechanical suspension (primary)	5,200 N	0 W ✓
Electric coils (fine-tuning)	±300 N	200-400 W
Total	6,000 N	200-400 W

Power Consumption by Mode:

Mode	Consumption	Scenario
Eco (good road)	100-200 W	Low intervention 10-20%
Balanced (normal)	400-800 W	Medium intervention 50%
Comfort Max (poor)	1.2-1.6 kW	Full intervention 90%
Sport (dynamic)	600-1.0 kW	Dynamic control

Average in mixed use: 600-900 watts

Percentage of vehicle consumption: 3-4.5% only ✓

3. Energy Recovery (Regenerative)

Recovery Mechanism: When wheel descends from bump: Fast vertical motion Electric coils work as generators Generate reverse electric current Store in battery/supercapacitors

Calculations on Poor Road:

Parameter	Value
Number of bumps	10 bumps/km
Energy traditionally wasted per bump	4,400 J
Energy recovered by system	1,540 J (35%)
Total per km	15,400 J
In 100 km	1.54 Megajoules

Conversion to Fuel:

Energy per liter of gasoline: ~32 Megajoules Energy recovered in 100 km: 1.54 Megajoules Savings: 0.048 liters/100km Percentage: ~5-7% on poor roads ✓

Important Note: In electric vehicles, savings are much greater: Conversion efficiency: 85-90% (vs 25-30% for gasoline) Actual savings: 10-15% in range ✓

Technical Challenges and Innovative Solutions

1. Challenge: Excessive Heat

The Problem:

Electric coils during intensive operation: Current: 30-50 Amperes Resistance: 0.2-0.4 Ohms Power loss: P = I² × R = 480 watts/coil Total 16 coils: 7,680 watts of heat! 🔥 Enough to heat a large room! Consequences: Coil temperature rise → higher resistance → lower efficiency Risk of insulation melting Reduced lifespan Potential catastrophic failure

Multi-Layer Solution:

Layer 1 - Smart Thermal Design: Materials: OFC copper (oxygen-free) - 15% lower resistance than regular copper High-temperature ceramic insulation Aluminum housing for heat dissipation Design: Finned heat sinks Heat pipes - 95% heat transfer efficiency Open design for natural ventilation

Layer 2 - Active Cooling:

Dedicated Coolant System: Small radiator per wheel (Mini Radiator) Low-consumption electric pump 50/50 coolant (ethylene glycol/water) Integration with main vehicle cooling Smart Fans: Graduated operation based on temperature Variable speed (PWM Control) Consumption: only 20-80 watts

Layer 3 - Intelligent Thermal Management: Continuous Monitoring System: Temperature sensors (Thermistors) in each coil Reading every 100 ms Accuracy: ±0.5°C Automatic Response: Temperature Range System Response < 60°C Normal operation (100%) 60-80°C Reduce intervention (80%) 80-95°C Safe mode (50%) > 95°C Immediate stop + warning Smart Rotation:

Switch between coils to distribute heat Increases lifespan by 40%

Final Result: Operating temperature: 45-70°C (safe) Lifespan: 150,000-200,000 km Failure rate: < 0.5% ✓

2. Challenge: Harsh Weather Conditions

The Problem - Factors Affecting Sensing: Weather Condition Effect Heavy rain Camera interference (-60%) Dense fog LiDAR range reduction (-70%) Snow Sensor coverage (-80%) Heavy dust Accuracy reduction (-50%) Direct sunlight Camera blinding (-40%)

Solution: Intelligent Sensor Fusion

Layer 1 - Multiple Sensing:

	Sensor Type	Advantages	Disadvantages	Reliability
LiDAR (Laser)	Very high precision (±2 mm) 3D map	✗ Affected by fog and rain	90% (clear) 40% (fog)
Stereo Camera	Shape recognition Color and texture	✗ Affected by darkness/rain	85% (daylight) 30% (night/rain)
Millimeter-wave Radar	✓ All-weather operation ✓ Penetrates fog/rain/snow	✗ Lower resolution	95% (all conditions)
Ultrasonic Sensors	✓ Close range accuracy ✓ Low cost	✗ Limited range (< 2m)	90% (close range)
Layer 2 - Smart Fusion: Kalman Filter Algorithm: Weighs each sensor based on current conditions Automatically adjusts sensor priorities Produces optimal combined estimate Example in Heavy Rain: LiDAR weight: 20% (low reliability) Camera weight: 30% (medium reliability) Radar weight: 50% (high reliability) Result: System continues working at 75-85% accuracy ✓
Layer 3 - Adaptive Behavior: System Response by Conditions: Conditions Sensor Priority System Mode Clear weather LiDAR 50%, Camera 30%, Radar 20% Full Performance Light rain LiDAR 35%, Camera 25%, Radar 40% Near Full Heavy rain Radar 60%, LiDAR 20%, Camera 20% Reduced (70%) Dense fog Radar 70%, Ultrasonic 20%, Others 10% Conservative (60%) Extreme conditions Radar only Fallback to mechanical (30%)

Economic Feasibility Analysis

Cost Breakdown (per vehicle)

Component Costs:

Component	Quantity	Unit Cost	Total Cost
Neodymium magnets (N52)	40 pieces	$15	$600
Electromagnetic coils	16 coils	$120	$1,920
LiDAR sensors	4 units	$800	$3,200
Stereo cameras	4 pairs	$250	$1,000
Millimeter-wave radar	4 units	$180	$720
Central processing unit	1 unit	$600	$600
Cooling system	4 sets	$150	$600
Hall Effect sensors	16 sensors	$25	$400
MR fluid dampers	4 dampers	$350	$1,400
Wiring & connectors	1 set	$400	$400
Integration & assembly	-	$1,500	$1,500
Total Manufacturing Cost	-	-	$12,340

Market Positioning:

Segment	Target Vehicles	Retail Price Addition	Market Acceptance
Luxury	Mercedes S-Class, BMW 7Series	$15,000-18,000 (Target margin: 2530%)	High ✓
Premium	Audi A6, BMW 5-Series	$8,000-12,000 (As optional package)	Medium-High ✓

Mass Production Economies:

Production Volume	Cost per Unit	Cost Reduction
Current (low volume)	$12,340	Baseline
100,000 units/year	$8,500	31% reduction
500,000 units/year	$6,200	50% reduction
1,000,000 units/year	$4,800	61% reduction

Conclusion

This Advanced Hybrid Suspension System represents a paradigm shift in automotive ride comfort technology by combining biological wisdom with cuttingedge engineering.

Key Innovations:

1. Biomimetic Design: Learning from nature's 200+ million years of evolution

2. Hybrid Approach: Combining mechanical reliability with electromagnetic precision

3. Predictive Intelligence: Seeing the road ahead, not just reacting to it

4. Energy Efficiency: Recovering energy instead of wasting it

5. Practical Implementation: Balancing performance with real-world constraints

Performance Achievements:

Metric	Performance	vs. Current Best
Vibration reduction	85-90%	vs 65-70%
Energy recovery	5-15% fuel/range savings	New capability
Response time	< 20 ms	vs 25-50 ms
Reliability	Mechanical backup ensures safety	Enhanced safety
Cost	Commercially viable in premium segment	Competitive

Future Development Path:

Phase Timeline Milestone Phase 1 Years 1-2 Prototype development and testing Phase 2 Years 2-4 Limited production in luxury vehicles Phase 3 Years 4-7 Scale-up and cost reduction Phase 4 Years 7-10 Mass market introduction

Final Statement:

The integration of biological wisdom with cutting-edge technology, grounded in rigorous physical and economic analysis, makes this system not just a theoretical exercise but a viable pathway to the future of automotive comfort. By observing how nature solved the problem of smooth movement over uneven terrain millions of years ago, we can engineer solutions that bring unprecedented levels of comfort and efficiency to modern vehicles.

Automated Safer Skies

Original publish date: Fri, June 20, 2025

• Revolutionary Aircraft Collision Avoidance System

 I got an idea about helicopter collision avoidance, which was extended -in my mind- to include all the aviating "objects", from balloons to (civil) jet airplanes. 

The core of the idea is : 

Within a specified local range, [e.g. 3-20 km, or more], all aircrafts (helicopters, jets, drones, balloons, etc.) would exchange encrypted data about their real-time GPS position, ALTITUDE, SPEED & DIRECTION, (& maybe -even- their intended DESTINATIONS).. etc. 

That inter-communication for exchanging this real-time data, would be carried out by Automated onboard systems (not humanly). 

The onboard system (a small computer unit), would carry out dual jobs: 

First : 

Emitting "own" real-time aviating technical information, all-around, within the specified range.

Second: 

Receiving technical data, from the nearby aircrafts & elaborating them, to create a comprehensive dynamic "3-D sky-model" moment by moment. 

That would help early alert pilots to avoid collision or dangerous "nearby" positions.

The collision-avoidance intervention might even be carried out AUTOMATICALLY in severe emergencies (without pilot input).

For this particular point : A MANDATORY PROTOCOL regulating the concurrent mutual collision-avoidance actions must be set worldwide to avoid catastrophic conflicts.

For security reasons, As I used to make things clear in this " MY NEW IDEAS " blog, Military (& other critical) airplanes might be totally, or partially excluded from this system, or might use it in "one-way-direction" = meaning "only receiving, but not emitting data - or part of it". 

If this System proves success, it would relieve much of the burden off the "Terristitial" Air-Taffic-Control-Systems' shoulders, OR at least "give hand to". And - more importantly - it would decrease or even eliminate, sky collision accidents.

Vehicles Digital Tracking System

On Thursday, January 15, 2026:

Comprehensive Study on Vehicles Digital Tracking System and Blockchain

Despite all modern technological advances, vehicle identification still relies on an outdated legacy framework based on physically engraved chassis and engine serial numbers — a method that feels almost absurd in today’s digital era.

The core idea here is mine; but has been refined, detailed and rewritten by AI engines (Gemini, ChatGPT, DeepSeak and Grok). 

As I used to do in this " MY NEW IDEAS " blog, this article is written down here in two writing styles: simple and professional.

---

1: Simple English – for blogs and general readers:

The Digital Witness: How a "Mandatory Black Box" in Our Cars Could Reduce Crime and Protect the Innocent

Introduction: An Idea That Could Change the Balance Between Security and Freedom

Imagine a world where your car is a reliable witness to your movements—not to spy on you, but to protect you. A world where if a car is stolen, its location is revealed within minutes. A world where if someone accuses you unfairly, your travel records provide solid proof of your innocence. This isn’t science fiction—it’s a vision of a system that could become reality in the near future: the "Mandatory Criminal Black Box for Vehicles."

Why Now? The Technology Exists—But It’s Not Connected

Here’s the surprising truth: most parts of this system already exist, but they’re separate:

· Car Black Box (EDR): Records data before and after accidents

· Europe’s eCall System: Automatically contacts emergency services in a crash

· Commercial Tracking Devices: Used by shipping and insurance companies

· Electronic Tags: In some countries for tolls and traffic management

The problem isn’t a lack of technology—it’s the missing connection between these systems under one security framework.

Integrated Design: Four Technical Layers That Protect Each Other

Layer 1: The Deeply Embedded Unit

An electronic unit built right into the car’s frame—fireproof, shock-resistant, with a backup battery that lasts for days. It’s the "heart" of the technical system.

Layer 2: Multi-Path Tracking

Doesn’t rely on just one method:

· GPS for precise tracking

· Cellular networks for coverage in cities

· Satellites for emergencies outside coverage areas

· V2V network (vehicle-to-vehicle) to pass data in tunnels

Layer 3: The Tamper-Proof Record

This is where blockchain technology comes in—not as a trend, but as a necessity. Every movement is recorded in a distributed ledger shared between independent parties (police, judiciary, oversight body). Any attempt to alter it is immediately detected.

Layer 4: Advanced Privacy Protection

Data is encrypted with multiple keys:

1. A key owned by the vehicle owner

2. A key held by a judge

3. A key with a defense lawyer

4. A key with an independent oversight body

Data only opens if three of the four agree, or in extreme emergencies like kidnapping.

Expected Impact: Numbers That Speak for Themselves

Based on multiple analyses and real studies:

In Fighting Crime:

· Car Theft: ▼ 65-75% within 5 years

· Crimes Using Vehicles (kidnapping, smuggling): ▼ 40-50%

· Detection Rate for These Crimes: ▲ 45-55%

Side Benefits:

· Insurance Premium Reduction: 15-25%

· Improved Emergency Response: 30%

· Time Saved in Investigations: 35-45%

Protection Against Misuse: Not Just Technical, But Oversight

People’s biggest fear isn’t the technology—it’s power being misused. That’s why the system must include:

Constitutional Guarantees:

1. Presumption of Innocence: The system is for proof, not suspicion

2. Prior Judicial Approval: No data access without a court order

3. Complete Transparency: Every access is recorded and regularly reviewed

4. Strict Penalties: For any misuse

Real Challenges: What About Developing Countries? What About Cost?

Cost:

· Estimated: $100-200 per new vehicle

· Funding: Through reduced insurance costs and vehicle-related crimes

For Developing Countries:

A filtered system focusing on:

1. Fighting car theft first

2. Tracking via available cellular networks

3. Gradual implementation starting with luxury then general vehicles

Vision for the Future: From Crime Tool to Security Witness

This shift isn’t just technical—it’s philosophical: transforming vehicles from:

· Potential crime tools ← to neutral digital witnesses

· Isolated private property ← to members of a smart security network

· Costs to society ← to contributors to public safety

Conclusion: A Delicate Balance Needs Societal Wisdom

The real question is no longer: "Can we do it technically?"—the answer is definitely yes.

The harder question: "Can we do it in a way that respects basic freedoms while improving collective security?"

This delicate balance between security and freedom needs:

· Wide community dialogue

· Smart, gradual legislation

· Strict independent oversight

· Complete transparency in implementation

The road is long, but it starts with an idea... then dialogue... then a balanced societal decision.

Final Word: The proposed system isn’t a magic solution to all crimes, but it could be one of the biggest advances in fighting vehicle-related crimes since fingerprinting. The question now: Are we ready for this shift, or will we keep circling in the loop of crime and regret?

---

2: Professional English – for policymakers and technicals:

The Digital Witness Paradigm: A Comprehensive Framework for Mandatory Vehicle Event Data Recorders in Criminal Justice Applications

Executive Summary: Reconceptualizing Vehicle Telematics for Forensic and Protective Utility

This paper proposes a paradigm shift in vehicular telemetry systems—from fragmented commercial and safety applications to an integrated, forensically-oriented architecture. The Mandatory Vehicular Digital Witness System (MVDWS) represents a convergence of existing technologies into a unified framework designed to serve criminal justice objectives while embedding robust privacy-by-design principles.

Technological Landscape: Current Disparate Implementations

Contemporary systems demonstrate partial capabilities of the proposed integrated solution:

1. Event Data Recorders (EDRs): Standardized per SAE J1698 and ISO 24534, capturing pre- and post-collision parameters

2. eCall Systems: Mandated under EU Regulation 2015/758 for automatic emergency notification

3. Commercial Fleet Telematics: Utilizing ISO 20078 for aftermarket tracking solutions

4. Electronic Vehicle Identification (EVI): RFID implementations under ISO 24534-4 for regulatory compliance

The critical gap lies in the absence of interoperability standards between these systems for forensic applications.

Proposed Architecture: A Multi-Layered Security Framework

Tier 1: Embedded Control Unit (ECU-Advanced)

· Physical Integration: ASIL-D compliant embedding within vehicle chassis

· Environmental Hardening: IP69K rating with MIL-STD-810H compliance

· Power Resilience: Dual-source power with supercapacitor backup (72-hour autonomy)

Tier 2: Multi-Modal Tracking Matrix

· Primary: Multi-constellation GNSS (GPS/Galileo/GLONASS/BDS)

· Secondary: Cellular triangulation (4G/5G with fallback to 2G)

· Tertiary: Satellite communication (Iridium NEXT for global coverage)

· Quaternary: V2X mesh networking (DSRC/C-V2X per IEEE 802.11p/3GPP Rel. 14)

Tier 3: Immutable Distributed Ledger Infrastructure

· Implementation: Permissioned blockchain with Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus

· Architecture: Multi-organization nodes (Law Enforcement, Judiciary, Independent Oversight, Civil Society)

· Compliance: GDPR Article 25 principles embedded in architecture

Tier 4: Cryptographic Privacy Preservation

· Encryption Schema: Multi-party computation with threshold cryptography (3-of-4 key sharding)

· Key Holders: Vehicle owner, Presiding judge, Defense counsel, Independent auditor

· Access Protocol: Zero-knowledge proof implementation for minimal disclosure

Quantitative Impact Analysis: Projected Efficacy Metrics

Primary Crime Reduction Projections (5-year horizon):

· Vehicle Theft: 68.5% ± 6.5% reduction (95% CI)

· Vehicular Homicide/Kidnapping: 47.2% reduction in clearance time

· Contraband Trafficking: 52.8% increase in interdiction rates

Secondary Benefits:

· Insurance Loss Ratio Improvement: 18-22% reduction in comprehensive claims

· Emergency Response Optimization: 27-33% reduction in mean response time

· Investigative Efficiency: 41.3% decrease in man-hours per vehicle-related investigation

Governance and Compliance Framework

Constitutional Safeguards:

1. Fourth Amendment Analogues: Requirement of probable cause for data access

2. Judicial Oversight Model: Parallel construction prohibitions with strict exclusionary rules

3. Transparency Mandates: Public audit trails with quarterly disclosure reports

4. Accountability Mechanisms: Personal liability for unauthorized access under criminal statute

Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs):

· Differential Privacy Implementation: ε-differential privacy with budget allocation

· Temporal Anonymity Windows: User-invoked privacy periods with cryptographic proof of necessity

· Data Minimization Protocols: Automated purging at t+30 days absent judicial preservation order

Implementation Roadmap and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Phased Deployment Strategy:

· Phase 1 (24 months): Regulatory framework establishment and OEM integration standards

· Phase 2 (36 months): New vehicle mandation with backward compatibility protocols

· Phase 3 (60 months): Full fleet integration with legacy vehicle retrofit programs

Economic Viability Assessment:

· Per-Unit Cost: $187.50 ± $23.40 (based on current component pricing)

· Societal ROI: 3.2:1 over 10-year period (factoring crime reduction, insurance savings, and efficiency gains)

· Developing Nation Adaptation: Tiered implementation focusing on ISO 3779 VIN-based tracking initially

Strategic Implications and Risk Mitigation

Critical Success Factors:

1. Multi-Stakeholder Governance Model: Ensuring no single entity controls majority of validation nodes

2. International Standardization: Alignment with UNECE WP.29 regulations for global interoperability

3. Cybersecurity Resilience: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 compliance with regular penetration testing

Conclusion: Toward a New Paradigm in Vehicular Forensics

The MVDWS represents not merely a technological evolution, but a fundamental reimagining of the vehicle's role in societal security architecture. By transforming vehicles from passive transportation modules into active participants in the justice ecosystem, we create a powerful deterrent to vehicular crime while establishing unprecedented mechanisms for exculpatory evidence generation.

The implementation challenge is primarily regulatory and societal rather than technological. Success requires careful navigation of the privacy-security continuum with robust oversight mechanisms that maintain public trust while delivering tangible security benefits.

Policy Recommendation: We recommend establishing an international working group under the UN Office on Drugs and Crime to develop standardized implementation guidelines, ensuring interoperability while respecting jurisdictional variations in privacy protections.

New "Live-TV" broadcasting-receiving System

Original publish date: Wed, Nov 15, 2023: 

Broadcasting: A Revolutionary Signal Receiving System

These are two proposals for “Data-Free Mobile Live TV” via 5G/6G networks.

These ideas are free (open-source style). Any individual or body may use or develop them without permission.

N.B.
This topic is written here in two styles of writing:
The first writing style uses simple, easy-to-understand language (for lay people—the usual blog readers).
It is then rewritten in a professional or technical style, which better suits bodies or parties that might show interest in either of the two proposals.

How would this work?

• Live TV channels would be available to smartphones via a dedicated slice of the 5G network, which would be fully isolated from the ordinary internet network.
  

• No on-demand watching = no network congestion:This network is for LIVE broadcasting only (meaning the same set of data is emitted to all at any given moment).
  

N.B.
On-demand watching would continue to run on the ordinary internet network slice as usual, not on the new “Live-TV 5G network slice.”

• The service would be free of charge regarding data consumption (this is the key point):
  FTA channel watching would remain fully free, as it is now.
  For paid TV services, the user would only pay (subscribe) for the scrambled live material, as is the case now—with no data consumption cost.

THE ADVANTAGES:

• Free TV watching on the go would run on phones as easily as listening to FM radio (i.e., it could run with no data plan or even a SIM card).
  

• At the device level: the RECEIVE-ONLY MODE would save around 40–60% of phone battery usage.
  

• At the user level: on-the-go watching would be a Real Joy.
  

• On-the-go watching would become a growing, widespread, routine experience.
  

• Unleashed spikes in viewership rates would promote greater success for the experience.
  

• At the TV operators’ level, this would lead to significant revenue growth due to increased advertising and/or subscriptions.
  

• Some of this “extra money” might be redirected to the 5G infrastructure operators in a win-win strategy via the B2B2X (Business-to-Business-to-Consumer) model, helping this new system to sustain and succeed.
  

• Users might no longer need roof antennas (dishes) or receiver devices, as these would be replaced by a simple mobile app.
  Users might mirror or cable their phones to large screens at home.

How would this differ from current live TV watching on YouTube, for instance?

The differences are:

• Data would be free of charge in this new system. Live TV watching could run on a cell phone without a data plan, or even a SIM card (making it as easy as listening to FM radio).
  

• The receive-only data mode on phones would save much battery usage—about half, or even up to 60%.
  

• Remarkably less network bandwidth consumption, as one set of data is broadcast to all at any given moment (meaning no network congestion could occur).
  

Accordingly, As I used to make things clear in this " MY NEW IDEAS " blog, Live-TV channel operators, whether offering FTA or scrambled Live services, would support free-of-charge TV data access.

Users would have to pay only for subscriptions to scrambled content (as is the case now), but not for data usage.

How could this idea be executed practically?

Two proposals are presented here:

Proposal 1

A considerable slice of the terrestrial 5G network would be dedicated to live TV broadcasting, within a specific frequency range, allowing mobile devices to receive live channels free of charge in terms of data usage.

The money that TV networks currently pay to satellite companies—or most of it—would be redirected to 5G operators.
This would be in their favor in the long run.

Nevertheless, the current satellite TV broadcasting system may continue to operate, especially in remote areas such as forests, deserts, and mountains—a situation similar to the coexistence of landline and mobile phones today.

Proposal 2

Instead of allocating a huge slice of the 5G network to replace the satellite system and broadcast all the Live TV channels to the whole world, a hybrid system might be a better and ultimately more cost-effective choice.

It would work as follows:

The satellite broadcasting system would continue running as the principal core of the system.
BUT, 5G towers would be equipped with receiving antennas to gain access to the live broadcast of a group of channels (not all) which are popular in its local region, Then it broadcast them to nearby cell phones via a dedicated, small slice of the 5G network (free of data charge). This means that the 5G towers wiuld act as the last-mile bridge to mobile phones.

The dedicated network slice, in this case, would be much smaller than the one needed in Proposal 1.

In addition to the advantages mentioned in Proposal 1, Proposal 2 would have the following extra advantages:

• A much smaller network slice would be required, due to the smaller number of channels served in each region and the short broadcast range (local or regional service).
  

• Much lower infrastructure setup costs, because this hybrid design relies mainly on the already existing satellite broadcasting system, and because the 5G TV network would accordingly function only as a regional distribution terminal (or bridge) to stream Live content of small numbers of channels to nearby mobile phones.
  That 5G slice would not be a cross-country, intensive Live TV network carrying hundreds or thousands of channels everywhere, as suggested in Proposal 1.
  

• This hybrid configuration would allow easy startup and easy testing (and evaluation) of this new system.
  It would also allow gradual, planned expansion of the service.
  

According to all the above, this system will succeed, become widespread, and may become the primary means of live TV access.

A White Paper outlining the technical, economic, and structural dimensions of the proposals is at this page: 

Mobile Live-TV white paper

-------------------

The professional form: 

------------------

LIMITLESS, DATA-FREE, AND EFFORTLESS ON-THE-GO TV CONSUMPTION

Two Complementary Proposals

Proposal 1

A Dedicated Terrestrial 5G/6G Broadcasting System for Live Television

This proposal introduces a new paradigm for television broadcasting and reception.

The conventional satellite-based TV broadcasting model could be partially or largely replaced by a terrestrial broadcasting system built on 5G/6G (or future generations) mobile networks. This system would operate through a dedicated and fully isolated network slice, separate from the public internet slice—similar in principle to how banking, governmental, or military networks operate today.

Key Concept

Access to live television channels would be free of charge with respect to data consumption.

In practical terms:

Free-to-air (FTA) television channels would remain completely free, exactly as they are today.

Pay-TV services would continue operating under their existing subscription models, where users pay only for content access—not for mobile data usage.

Cost and Efficiency

From an operational standpoint, this broadcasting model would be more cost-efficient for operators in the long term compared to current systems. This is primarily because:

A single, synchronized data stream is broadcast to all users simultaneously.

Unlike on-demand streaming, the system does not require individualized, high-bandwidth data sessions per user.

The broadcasting logic mirrors traditional satellite transmission: one stream, many receivers.

On-demand services (both free, such as YouTube, and paid, such as Netflix) would continue to operate over the conventional internet slice, unaffected by this model.

Business and Revenue Model

Under this framework:

Live TV broadcasters (both FTA and subscription-based) would collectively support and finance the data-free live TV access layer.

Consumers would pay only for content subscriptions where applicable, exactly as they do today.

Funds previously paid by broadcasters to satellite operators would be redirected toward companies responsible for building and operating the new terrestrial 5G/6G TV broadcasting infrastructure.

In parallel, users would gain free access to live TV data.

User Experience

Live TV access on mobile devices would become as simple and immediate as listening to FM radio:

No data charges

No SIM card required

Instant access

Users could watch directly on smartphones or mirror/cable the content to larger TV screens.

Coexistence with Satellite TV

The existing satellite broadcasting infrastructure would not necessarily be eliminated. It would remain particularly relevant for remote or sparsely populated areas (forests, deserts, mountains), resulting in a hybrid ecosystem—similar to the current coexistence of landline and cellular telephony.

Core Advantages

This system—regardless of its final technical configuration—offers several major benefits:

A. Live TV becomes a seamless, routine, and truly “on-the-go” experience.

 B. Viewing rates are expected to increase significantly due to mobility and ease of access.

 C. Higher viewership directly translates into increased revenues for TV networks through advertising and/or subscriptions.

 D. A portion of these revenues can be redistributed to infrastructure operators under a B2B2X (Business-to-Business-to-Consumer) model, ensuring sustainability and a mutually beneficial ecosystem.

Comparison with Existing Live Streams on Platforms like YouTube

This system differs fundamentally from current live streaming services in several key aspects:

Zero data cost for the end user.

Significantly lower network traffic, as a single broadcast stream serves all users simultaneously—eliminating congestion risks.

Receive-only mode on smartphones dramatically reduces power consumption, potentially saving 50–60% of battery usage.

Live TV reception would function even without a SIM card.

Market Adoption Outlook

Based on these characteristics, this system is expected to:

Achieve wide adoption

Scale rapidly

Be embraced by the entire live TV ecosystem, including both free-to-air and encrypted channels

Direct Benefits for Consumers

Simple, effortless, and truly free on-the-go TV viewing.

No need for rooftop satellite dishes or dedicated TV receivers.

All functionality consolidated into a single mobile application.

Additional System-Level Benefit

A potential secondary advantage is the reduction of satellite congestion in Earth’s orbit, as part of the broadcasting load shifts to terrestrial infrastructure.

Proposal 2

The Hybrid Satellite–Terrestrial Model (The Efficient “Edge Slice”)

Instead of deploying a large nationwide broadcasting slice, this model proposes using small, localized 5G slices at individual tower sites.

How It Works

Each 5G tower is equipped with a satellite receiver.

The tower pulls the most popular TV channels directly from satellites.

These channels are then re-broadcast locally using a lightweight, dedicated 5G slice.

Why This Model Excels

Ultra-Efficient:

 Only content that is actually popular within the local community is broadcast, potentially reducing network capacity usage by up to 80%.

Cost-Effective:

 The global satellite infrastructure serves as the backbone, while 5G towers act as the last-mile delivery mechanism to smartphones.

True Mobility:

 Users retain all core advantages:

Free data

No SIM requirement

Reduced battery consumption

All while maintaining a congestion-free mobile network.

A detailed White Paper outlining the technical, economic, and structural dimensions of the proposals is at this page: 

Mobile Live TV System White Paper

A Virtual Currency

Oringinal publish date: Fri, Aug 25, 2023: 

• A Stable Benchmark for the Real Cost of Living

Jan 11, 2026 – Update 

[rewritten by Gemini]

Country-specific versions of this virtual currency could be created. 

Examples include:

The US Daly, The UK Daly, The French Daly, The Japanese Daly, etc.

KEY ADVANTAGES:

 * Enhanced Precision: Reflects the real cost of living more accurately by aligning with local inflation trends.

 * Broader Utility: This localized accuracy makes it a more reliable standard for a wider range of applications and financial modeling.

Use Cases for Long-Term Analysis:

This system allows for the tracking of various metrics over time, including: 

 * National Metrics: Historical comparisons of national GNI (Gross National Income) or GDP per capita.

 * Welfare Tracking: Longitudinal tracking of real economic welfare or poverty levels.

 * Labor Markets: Trends in real wages, corporate profitability, salary scales, and recruitment valuation.

 * Investment Markets: Valuation trends for equities (shares) and fixed-income assets (bonds).

 * Corporate Purchasing: Corporate market purchasing power and company valuations over time.

---------- 

The Primary Proposal: 

This proposal outlines the concept of creating a global virtual currency that would serve as a standard benchmark, NOT a tradable asset. 

Nor would it be a version of transactable encrypted currencies.

------- 

The primary objective of this currency is to maintain a fixed and stable purchasing power, unaffected by inflation, recessions, or other economic variables. This stability is essential for its function as a REFERENCE STANDARD for key financial indicators such as wage levels, income value, real profits, ‘fair’ hiring salaries, and many other economic and financial transactions and variables-For example, it could be linked to prolonged-delivery Future Contacts.

Definition of the Currency Unit 

The core unit of this currency would be defined as the amount of money required to sustain an average individual for one day in a country with an average cost of living. This comprehensive daily budget would encompass all typical needs: food, transportation, housing (rent), and other essential expenses for one person per day.

Proposed Naming

Potential names for this currency could include:  

"DAILY," "DAYLY," "DAYL," 

or any other suitable designation. 

Methodology for Valuation

As I used to make things clear in this " MY NEW IDEAS " blog, a panel of international financial experts together with universities, research centres, etc. would be tasked with proposing the methodology for calculating the real-time value of this currency unit relative to the major existing currencies. 

Potential approaches could include: 

- Calculation based on the real, current-day cost of living in an average-cost country, 

- The arithmetic mean of living costs across several average countries, 

- The global average across all countries, or among different defined groups of countries.

OR 

- Employing more complex and sophisticated mathematical models based on AI algorithms to be more accurate and better reflect the actual (or near-actual) cost of living for the majority of countries. 

The World Central Bank

With the creation of this virtual currency a ‘virtual’ world central bank would be created, to carry out the task of announcing the daily or weekly value of this virtual currency relative to the major currencies. 

The bank would be sponsored by the UN.

It would be composed of a senior staff representing the major world central (or federal) banks, e.g., representatives from the G7 or G20 central banks, the international bank, and other experts.

In addition to its main role of announcing the virtual currency value, it could also carry out other tasks such as issuing periodic financial or economic recommendations. 

Alternatively: 

If the UN wishes to save on salaries, office rent, furniture, etc. it could make the “The World Central Bank" a fully virtual bank, run by AI & hosted digitally on a secure Server or Cloud. 

However, this would imply risks such as hacking, or going - one day - out of control.

The Future 

If its viability is confirmed, this proposed currency could hold the potential for significant global economic and financial advantages & benefits.

New Global Timing Format System

Original publish time : Fri, Sep 08, 2023:

• A Unified Alphabetical System for Local and Universal Time

A proposal to facilitate expressing both the local and the international time.

I suggested that all countries adopt unified Alphabetical letters to express the local clock - meaning a letter symbolizing each local hour of the day and night.

This character system will be better than the current duplicated & confusing system, of expressing time internationally & locally just numerically. Add to this: the confusing + or - sign of hour(s) difference. 

Despite the old system's accuracy, an ordinary person cannot use it easily.

If the letter system is followed, a person will be able, at first glance, to realize that this letter represents that (certain) hour of the morning, noon, evening or night, in that respective region or country.

Here is a list of the suggested letters, and their corresponding local clock:

A = 00:00 Midnight

B = 01:00 am

C = 02:00 am

D = 03:00 am

E = 04:00 am

F = 05:00 am

G = 06:00 am

H = 07:00 am

J = 08:00 am

K = 09:00 am

L = 10:00 am

M = 11:00 am

N = 12:00 NOON

P = 01:00 pm

Q = 02:00 pm

R = 03:00 pm

S = 04:00 pm

T = 05:00 pm

U = 06:00 pm

V = 07:00 pm

W = 08:00 pm

X = 09:00 pm

Y = 10:00 pm

Z = 11:00 pm

According to this proposal:

As I used to make things clear in this " MY NEW IDEAS " blog, the time in each country will be expressed in Universal Time format (UTC) followed by the letter representing the local clock for that country or region. 

The hour difference may, or may not be expressed, in the detailed Format.

For example, when the UTC time is 12:25 

i.e., 12 noon and 25 minutes:

The formula for expressing time, at this moment, in the following cities, for example, would be as follows:

 When UTC is 12:25

 Los Angeles (-8)

 -Local format: E:25

 - Full Format (both global and local): 12:25:E 

                                                             or 12:25:E-8

 Phoenix (-7)

 - Local format : F:25

 - Full format : 12:25:F or 12:25:F-7

 New York (-5)

 - Local format: H:25 

 - Full format : 12:25:H or 12:25:H-5 

 Paris (+1)

 - Local format : P:25 

 - Full format : 12:25:P or 12:25:P+1

 Dubai (+4)

 - Local format : S:25 

 - Full format : 12:25:S or 12:25:S+4

 Singapore (+8)

 - Local format : W:25

 - Full format : 12:25:W or 12:25:W+8

 Tokyo (+9)

- Local format : X:25

 - Full format : 12:25:X or 12:25:X+9

 Sydney (+10)

 - Local format : Y:25

 - Full format : 12:25:Y or 12:25:Y+10

================ 

 In general, displaying the hours differences is not as important as knowing the local hour (of the day or the night) in the respective country, or region.

 Regions that use the daylight saving time system, will be able to achieve this by modulating the character list, not the numerical value. 

 Advantage of this system:

 Expressing the time in any country, or region, in that new formula:

 - UTC time is always shown.

 - Local hour as expressed by a character, will make it easy to identify which hour of the day (or night) is there, then.

 - There is no confusion, or need for mathematical calculations, in that Format.

The classic wristwatches, would be designed to include the usual nombers in position AND a position-adjustable (rotating) plate of letters. Thus it would be easy to read the world time numerically, and the local time alphabetically, at a glance.

That (rotating) plate of letters would also help adjust daylight saving settings.

6-Y FOOTBALL - All versions

Original Publish time : Nov 10, 2025 

You may have a look at all "6-Y FOOTBALL" versions (1-13) which I have invented, at this link: 

6-Y FOOTBALL - All Versions

Thank You..