MY NEW IDEAS

[This is not a sort of "New Ideas". It is just a unique personal view of what is already set.] TYPES OF HUMAN THINKING : A – CONSTRUCTIVE THINKING Human beings act to achieve specific goals. Any action performed incorrectly often fails to achieve its intended purpose. Thinking is a mental activity carried out by the mind, and it must be done properly in order to be useful and productive. The true purpose of thinking is to identify effective means for achieving our goals and solving our problems. This type of thinking is called “constructive thinking” or planning thinking. It does not add new knowledge; rather, it proposes a sequence of steps or actions required to reach a specific goal or solve a particular problem. Constructive (planning) thinking can only be performed correctly under three conditions: 1. The existence of a clear goal or problem. 2. Sufficient information (a knowledge base) to determine the means and steps. 3. Sound logic when constructing the plan, based o...

I don't know if anyone has thought of this idea before.  Long coastal roads are exposed to strong lateral or semi-lateral sea winds. This may cause inconvenience for the driver of the car to keep the car within the lane on the road.  I experienced this myself.  The automatic lane-keeping feature in modern cars is supposed to compensate for this. However, not all roads have clear lane markings that allow this feature to work, especially long, remote coastal roads.  Also: Not all cars are equipped with this function.  I have a suggestion here: Installation of air pressure sensors on the sides and/or the corners of the car, so that it can electronically determine the direction and intensity of the wind, and thus automatically enhance the necessary pressure on the steering wheel to keep it in the lane, instead of the annoying manual effort of the driver. This is not a part of an automated driving mode (pilot driving). It is just a sort of "mechanical" assistance or ...

That idea WILL encourage teams to focus more strongly,  on both offense and defense strategies. And hence perform at higher levels of play. This idea is based on rewarding teams for their overall goal difference throughout the whole league season, rather than just their match wins.  In other words, the league table would NOT be determined by gained points, but by the overall goal difference.  In case of a tie, the team that scored more goals would be given priority.  If there is a potential criticism of this system, saying a team might be lucky, as it wins against a weak team by a large margin.  The response to that criticism is that this "weak team" will face all the other teams as well. Another response is that the current "points system" isn't entirely fair, as it gives three points to a team that had a mediocre performance but managed hardly to score a winning goal, while it (the same current points system) gives the same three points to a wonderful team tha...